Early computed tomography coronary angiography and preventative treatment in patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome: A secondary analysis of the RAPID-CTCA trial.

BACKGROUND: Computed tomography coronary angiography (CTCA) offers detailed assessment of the presence of coronary atherosclerosis and helps guide patient management. We investigated influences of early CTCA on the subsequent use of preventative treatment in patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome. METHODS: In this secondary analysis of a multicenter randomized controlled trial of early CTCA in intermediate-risk patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome, prescription of aspirin, P2Y12 receptor antagonist, statin, renin-angiotensin system blocker, and beta-blocker therapies from randomization to discharge were compared within then between those randomized to early CTCA or to standard of care only. Effects of CTCA findings on adjustment of these therapies were further examined. RESULTS: In 1,743 patients (874 randomized to early CTCA and 869 to standard of care only), prescription of P2Y12 receptor antagonist, dual antiplatelet, and statin therapies increased more in the early CTCA group (between-group difference: 4.6% [95% confidence interval, 0.3-8.9], 4.5% [95% confidence interval, 0.2-8.7], and 4.3% [95% confidence interval, 0.2-8.5], respectively), whereas prescription of other preventative therapies increased by similar extent in both study groups. Among patients randomized to early CTCA, there were additional increments of preventative treatment in those with obstructive coronary artery disease and higher rates of reductions in antiplatelet and beta-blocker therapies in those with normal coronary arteries. CONCLUSIONS: Prescription patterns of preventative treatment varied during index hospitalization in patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome. Early CTCA facilitated targeted individualization of these therapies based on the extent of coronary artery disease.

Patient Adherence to Secondary Prevention Therapies After an Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Scoping Review.

PURPOSE: Adherence to guideline-recommended, long-term secondary preventative therapies among patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is fundamental to improving long-term outcomes. The purpose of this scoping review was to provide a broad synopsis of pertinent studies in a structured and comprehensive way regarding factors that influence patient adherence to medical therapy after ACS. METHODS: Relevant articles focusing on adherence to medical therapy after ACS were retrieved from the EMBASE and MEDLINE databases (search date, September 7, 2021). Studies were independently screened, and relevant information was extracted. FINDINGS: A total of 58 studies were identified by using the EMBASE and MEDLINE databases. Adherence to secondary prevention was moderate to low and steadily decreased over time. Nearly 30% of patients discontinued one or more medications within 90 days of their primary ACS, and adherence decreased to 50% to 60% at 1 year postdischarge. There were no major differences in adherence between drug classes. Factors influencing patient adherence can be broadly divided into 3 categories: patient related, health care system related, and disease related. Patients managed with percutaneous coronary interventions were more adherent to follow-up treatment than medically managed patients. Depression was reported as a major psychological factor that negatively affected adherence. Improved adherence was observed when higher levels of patient education and provider engagement were delivered during postdischarge follow-up, particularly when scheduled early. Notably, the incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events was lower in hospitals with high 90-day medication adherence than those with moderate or low adherence. IMPLICATIONS: Patient nonadherence to guideline-recommended long-term pharmacologic secondary preventative therapies after ACS is multifactorial. A comprehensive multifaceted approach should be implemented to improve adherence and clinical outcomes. This approach should include key interventions such as early follow-up visits, high medication adherence at 90 days, patient engagement and education, and development of novel interventions that support the 3 broad categories influencing patient adherence as discussed in this review.

Protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis on randomized clinical trials for direct oral anticoagulant in subjects with acute coronary syndrome

Background: Recently, direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) has been projected for secondary prevention of recurrent ischemic events post-acute coronary syndrome (ACS). The addition of a DOAC to the antiplatelet regimen of subjects with the ACS is clinically practiced in candidates where compelling anticoagulation is indicated by high thromboembolic risk. The current evidence provides approved compelling indication for the DOAC, particularly for rivaroxaban which bears the strongest existing evidence. Objective: We intend to assess the role of DOAC in addition to single or dual antiplatelet therapy in subjects with ACS. We will compare the clinical characteristics and explore the efficacy and safety of the DOAC class members (apixaban, betrixaban, dabigatran, edoxaban and rivaroxaban) in terms of reduction in ischemic events in subjects with ACS (ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction [STEMI] or non–ST-segment elevation [NSTEMI]) or subjects who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and or ACS and coexisting atrial fibrillation (AF). Methods: Relevant data will be searched on known data-bases such as Embase, Google Scholar, the Cochrane Central, and PubMed. The trials included will be randomized controlled trials from 2009 to 2022. Subjects will be receiving DOAC for ACS were evaluated for inclusion. The extraction, synthesis, quality, and validity of data will follow the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines. The risk of bias tool, version 2.0 (Cochrane) will be used for risk of bias assessment. Data will be pooled using random-effects models. The primary outcome measure will be efficacy end point (composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, and stroke), while the safety outcome will be minor/major bleeding. (AU)

[Twenty years of epidemiology of acute coronary syndromes in Italy: how cardiovascular epidemiology can guide secondary prevention strategies]. / Vent'anni di epidemiologia delle sindromi coronariche acute in Italia: come l'epidemiologia cardiovascolare può orientare la clinica e le strategie di prevenzione secondaria.

Over the last 20 years the epidemiology of acute coronary syndromes (ACS) has significantly changed, affecting both the acute and post-acute phases. In particular, although the progressive reduction in in-hospital mortality, the trend in post-hospital mortality was found to be stable or increasing. This trend was at least in part attributed to the improved short-term prognosis due to coronary interventions in the acute phase, which ultimately have increased the population of survivors at high risk of relapse. Thus, while hospital management of ACS has shown great progress in terms of diagnostic and therapeutic efficacy, post-hospital care has not had a parallel development. This is certainly partly attributable to the inadequacy of post-discharge cardiologic facilities, so far not planned according to the level of risk of individual patients. Hence, it is crucial that patients at high risk of relapse are identified and initiated into more intensive secondary prevention strategies. On the basis of epidemiological data, the cornerstones of post-ACS prognostic stratification are represented on the one hand by the identification of heart failure (HF) at index hospitalization, on the other hand by the assessment of residual ischemic risk. In patients presenting with HF at index hospitalization, the fatal rehospitalization rate increases by 0.90% per year from 2001 to 2011, with a mortality between discharge and the first year which in 2011 was equal to 10%. The risk of fatal readmission at 1 year is therefore strongly conditioned by the presence of HF which, together with age, is the major predictor of new events. The effect of high residual ischemic risk on subsequent mortality shows increasing trend up to the second year of follow-up, moderately increasing over the years until reaching a plateau around the fifth year. These observations confirm the need for long-term secondary prevention programs and implementation of a continuous surveillance in selected patients.

A Comprehensive Secondary Prevention Benchmark (2PBM) Score Identifying Differences in Secondary Prevention Care in Patients After Acute Coronary Syndrome.

PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to quantify secondary prevention care by creating a secondary prevention benchmark (2PBM) score for patients undergoing ambulatory cardiac rehabilitation (CR) after acute coronary syndrome (ACS). METHODS: In this observational cohort study, 472 consecutive ACS patients who completed the ambulatory CR program between 2017 and 2019 were included. Benchmarks for secondary prevention medication and clinical and lifestyle targets were predefined and combined in the comprehensive 2PBM score with maximum 10 points. The association of patient characteristics and achievement rates of components and the 2PBM were assessed using multivariable logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Patients were on average 62 ± 11 yr of age and predominantly male (n = 406; 86%). The types of ACS were ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) in 241 patients (51%) and non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction in 216 patients (46%). Achievement rates for components of the 2PBM were 71% for medication, 35% for clinical benchmark, and 61% for lifestyle benchmark. Achievement of medication benchmark was associated with younger age (OR = 0.979: 95% CI, 0.959-0.996, P = .021), STEMI (OR = 2.05: 95% CI, 1.35-3.12, P = .001), and clinical benchmark (OR = 1.80: 95% CI, 1.15-2.88, P = .011). Overall ≥8 of 10 points were reached by 77% and complete 2PBM by 16%, which was independently associated with STEMI (OR = 1.79: 95% CI, 1.06-3.08, P = .032). CONCLUSIONS: Benchmarking with 2PBM identifies gaps and achievements in secondary prevention care. ST-elevation myocardial infarction was associated with the highest 2PBM scores, suggesting best secondary prevention care in patients after ST-elevation myocardial infarction.

Optimising adherence to secondary prevention medications following acute coronary syndrome utilising telehealth cardiology pharmacist clinics: a matched cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Adherence to secondary prevention medications following acute coronary syndromes (ACS) is a predictor of future major adverse cardiovascular events. Underutilisation of these medications is associated with higher risk of major adverse cardiovascular events globally. AIM: To explore the effects of a telehealth cardiology pharmacist clinic on patient adherence to secondary prevention medications in the 12 months following ACS. METHOD: Retrospective matched cohort study within a large regional health service comparing patient populations before and after implementation of pharmacist clinic with 12-month follow up. Patients who received percutaneous coronary intervention for ACS were consulted by the pharmacist at 1, 3- and 12-months. Matching criteria included age, sex, presence of left ventricular dysfunction and ACS type. Primary outcome was difference in adherence in adherence at 12 months post ACS. Secondary outcomes included major adverse cardiovascular events at 12 months and validation of self-reported adherence using medication possession ratios from pharmacy dispensing records. RESULTS: There were 156 patients in this study (78 matched pairs). Analysis of adherence at 12 months demonstrated an absolute increase in adherence by 13% (31 vs. 44%, p = 0.038). Furthermore, sub-optimal medical therapy (less than 3 ACS medication groups at 12 months) reduced by 23% (31 vs. 8%, p = 0.004). CONCLUSION: This novel intervention significantly improved adherence to secondary prevention medications at 12 months, a demonstrated contributor to clinical outcomes. Primary and secondary outcomes in the intervention group were both statistically significant. Pharmacist-led follow up improves adherence and patient outcomes.

Cognitive Function and the Relationship With Health Literacy and Secondary Prevention in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome at Early Discharge: A Prospective Observational Study.

BACKGROUND: Cognitive impairment (CI) may contribute to difficulties in understanding and implementing secondary prevention behavior change after acute coronary syndrome (ACS), but the association is poorly understood. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to explore the prevalence of CI in patients 4 weeks post ACS and the association with health literacy and secondary prevention. METHODS: Patients with ACS who were free from visual deficits, auditory impairment, and dementia diagnoses were recruited and assessed 4 weeks post discharge for cognitive function (Montreal Cognitive Assessment and Hopkins Verbal Learning Test), health literacy (Newest Vital Sign), depression (Patient Health Questionnaire), physical activity (Fitbit Activity Tracker and Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly), and medication knowledge and adherence. RESULTS: Participants (n = 45) had an average age of 65 ± 11 years, 82% were male, 64% were married/partnered, and 82% had high school education or higher. Overall CI was identified in 28.9% (n = 13/45) of the patients 4 weeks after discharge, which was composed of patients detected on both the Montreal Cognitive Assessment and Hopkins Verbal Learning Test (n = 3), patients detected on Montreal Cognitive Assessment alone (n = 6), and patients detected on Hopkins Verbal Learning Test alone (n = 4). Fewer patients with CI had adequate health literacy (61.4%) than patients with normal cognition (90.3%, P = .024). Significant correlations were found between Hopkins Verbal Learning Test scores and medication knowledge (0.4, P = .008) and adherence (0.33, P = .029). CONCLUSIONS: In this exploratory study, 30% of patients with ACS demonstrated CI at 4 weeks post discharge. Two screening instruments were required to identify all cases. Cognitive impairment was significantly associated with health literacy and worth further investigation.

Text Messages to Improve Medication Adherence and Secondary Prevention After Acute Coronary Syndrome: The TEXTMEDS Randomized Clinical Trial.

BACKGROUND: TEXTMEDS (Text Messages to Improve Medication Adherence and Secondary Prevention After Acute Coronary Syndrome) examined the effects of text message-delivered cardiac education and support on medication adherence after an acute coronary syndrome. METHODS: TEXTMEDS was a single-blind, multicenter, randomized controlled trial of patients after acute coronary syndrome. The control group received usual care (secondary prevention as determined by the treating clinician); the intervention group also received multiple motivational and supportive weekly text messages on medications and healthy lifestyle with the opportunity for 2-way communication (text or telephone). The primary end point of self-reported medication adherence was the percentage of patients who were adherent, defined as >80% adherence to each of up to 5 indicated cardioprotective medications, at both 6 and 12 months. RESULTS: A total of 1424 patients (mean age, 58 years [SD, 11]; 79% male) were randomized from 18 Australian public teaching hospitals. There was no significant difference in the primary end point of self-reported medication adherence between the intervention and control groups (relative risk, 0.93 [95% CI, 0.84-1.03]; P=0.15). There was no difference between intervention and control groups at 12 months in adherence to individual medications (aspirin, 96% vs 96%; ß-blocker, 84% vs 84%; angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin receptor blocker, 77% vs 80%; statin, 95% vs 95%; second antiplatelet, 84% vs 84% [all P>0.05]), systolic blood pressure (130 vs 129 mm Hg; P=0.26), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (2.0 vs 1.9 mmol/L; P=0.34), smoking (P=0.59), or exercising regularly (71% vs 68%; P=0.52). There were small differences in lifestyle risk factors in favor of intervention on body mass index <25 kg/m2 (21% vs 18%; P=0.01), eating ≥5 servings per day of vegetables (9% vs 5%; P=0.03), and eating ≥2 servings per day of fruit (44% vs 39%; P=0.01). CONCLUSIONS: A text message-based program had no effect on medical adherence but small effects on lifestyle risk factors. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=364448; Unique identifier: ANZCTR ACTRN12613000793718.

Text Messages to Promote Secondary Prevention after Acute Coronary Syndrome (IMPACS trial)

Abstract Background Short message service (SMS) to promote healthcare improves the control of cardiovascular risk factors, but there is a lack of evidence in low and middle-income countries, particularly after acute coronary syndromes (ACS). Objective This study aims to evaluate whether the use of SMS increases risk factor control after hospital discharge for ACS. Methods IMPACS is a 2-arm randomized trial with 180 patients hospitalized due to ACS at a tertiary hospital in Brazil. Eligible patients were randomized (1:1) to an SMS intervention (G1) or standard care (G2) upon hospital discharge. The primary endpoint was set to achieve 4 or 5 points in a risk factor control score, consisting of a cluster of 5 modifiable risk factors: LDL-C <70mg/dL, blood pressure (BP) <140/90mmHg, regular exercise (≥5 days/week, 30 minutes/session), nonsmoker status, and body mass index (BMI) <25 kg/m2] at 6 months. Secondary outcomes were components of the primary outcome plus rehospitalization, cardiovascular death, and death from any cause. Results are designated as significant if p<0.05. Results From randomized patients, 147 were included in the final analysis. Mean age was 58 (51-64) years, 74% males. The primary outcome was achieved by 12 (16.2%) patients in G1 and 15 (20.8%) in G2 (OR=0.73, 95%CI 0.32-1.70, p=0.47). Secondary outcomes were also similar: LDL-C<70 mg/dl (p=0.33), BP<140/90 mmHg (p=0.32), non-smoker (p=0.74), regular exercise (p=0.97), BMI (p=0.71), and rehospitalization (p=0.06). Death from any cause occurred in three participants (2%), including one cardiovascular death in each group. Conclusion SMS intervention did not significantly improve cardiovascular risk factor control when compared to standard care in patients discharged after ACS in Brazil.

Sex disparity in secondary prevention pharmacotherapy and clinical outcomes following acute coronary syndrome.

AIMS: We sought to investigate if sex disparity exists for secondary prevention pharmacotherapy following acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and impact on long-term clinical outcomes. METHODS AND RESULTS: We analysed data on medical management 30-day post-percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for ACS in 20 976 patients within the multicentre Melbourne Interventional Group registry (2005-2017). Optimal medical therapy (OMT) was defined as five guideline-recommended medications, near-optimal medical therapy (NMT) as four medications, sub-optimal medical therapy (SMT) as ≤3 medications. Overall, 65% of patients received OMT, 27% NMT and 8% SMT. Mean age was 64 ± 12 years; 24% (4931) were female. Women were older (68 ± 12 vs. 62 ± 12 years) and had more comorbidities. Women were less likely to receive OMT (61% vs. 66%) and more likely to receive SMT (10% vs. 8%) compared to men, P < 0.001. On long-term follow-up (median 5 years, interquartile range 2-8 years), women had higher unadjusted mortality (20% vs. 13%, P < 0.001). However, after adjusting for medical therapy and baseline risk, women had lower long-term mortality [hazard ratio (HR) 0.88, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.79-0.98; P = 0.02]. NMT (HR 1.17, 95% CI 1.05-1.31; P = 0.004) and SMT (HR 1.79, 95% CI 1.55-2.07; P < 0.001) were found to be independent predictors of long-term mortality. CONCLUSION: Women are less likely to be prescribed optimal secondary prevention medications following PCI for ACS. Lower adjusted long-term mortality amongst women suggests that as well as baseline differences between gender, optimization of secondary prevention medical therapy amongst women can lead to improved outcomes. This highlights the need to focus on minimizing the gap in secondary prevention pharmacotherapy between sexes following ACS.

The impact of Mediterranean diet on coronary plaque vulnerability, microvascular function, inflammation and microbiome after an acute coronary syndrome: study protocol for the MEDIMACS randomized, controlled, mechanistic clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Primary prevention trials have demonstrated that the traditional Mediterranean diet is associated with a reduction in cardiovascular mortality and morbidity. However, this benefit has not been proven for secondary prevention after an acute coronary syndrome (ACS). We hypothesized that a high-intensity Mediterranean diet intervention after an ACS decreases the vulnerability of atherosclerotic plaques by complex interactions between anti-inflammatory effects, microbiota changes and modulation of gene expression. METHODS: The MEDIMACS project is an academically funded, prospective, randomized, controlled and mechanistic clinical trial designed to address the effects of an active randomized intervention with the Mediterranean diet on atherosclerotic plaque vulnerability, coronary endothelial dysfunction and other mechanistic endpoints. One hundred patients with ACS are randomized 1:1 to a monitored high-intensity Mediterranean diet intervention or to a standard-of-care arm. Adherence to diet is assessed in both arms using food frequency questionnaires and biomarkers of compliance. The primary endpoint is the change (from baseline to 12 months) in the thickness of the fibrous cap of a non-significant atherosclerotic plaque in a non-culprit vessel, as assessed by repeated optical coherence tomography intracoronary imaging. Indices of coronary vascular physiology and changes in gastrointestinal microbiota, immunological status and protein and metabolite profiles will be evaluated as secondary endpoints. DISCUSSION: The results of this trial will address the key effects of dietary habits on atherosclerotic risk and will provide initial data on the complex interplay of immunological, microbiome-, proteome- and metabolome-related mechanisms by which non-pharmacological factors may impact the progression of coronary atherosclerosis after an ACS. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03842319 . Registered on 13 May 2019.

Influence of Factors Affecting Quality of Life on in-Hospital Cardiovascular Events of Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction with and without ST-segment Elevation

Abstract Background Acute myocardial infarction (AMI), with and without ST-segment elevation (STEMI and NSTEMI, respectively), is the principal cause of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in Brazil and around the world. Modifiable risk factors (RF) and quality of life (QOL) may correlate with the type of AMI. Objective To evaluate the influence of QOL and RF on the type of AMI and in-hospital cardiovascular events in STEMI and NSTEMI patients. Methods This was an observational, cross-sectional study. Patients with AMI attending four referral hospitals (three private and one public) for cardiovascular disease treatment were assessed for QOL using the Brazilian version of the 36-item short form survey. A p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results We evaluated 480 volunteers; 51% were treated in one of the private hospitals. In total, 55.6% presented with STEMI, and 44.4% with NSTEMI. Patients from the public hospital were 8.56 times more likely to have STEMI compared to those from the private hospitals. There was a higher prevalence of smokers in STEMI (p < 0.028) patients. QOL was not associated with the type of AMI. A negative patient perception of the physical health and pain domains was observed. Although a significant difference between the physical and the mental health domains was not observed, individual domains were correlated with some in-hospital outcomes. Conclusion There was a higher prevalence of smokers among individuals with STEMI. Domains of QOL showed a statistically significant relationship with the occurrence of in-hospital cardiovascular events, with no difference between the types of AMI.

Effect of frailty on initiation of statins following incident acute coronary syndromes in patients aged ≥75 years.

INTRODUCTION: Statin use for preventing recurrent acute coronary syndromes (ACS) is low in older people due to many clinical factors, including frailty. Using the recently developed hospital frailty risk score, which allows ascertainment of frailty from real-world data, we examined the association between frailty and initiation of statin treatment following incident ACS in patients aged ≥75 years. Our secondary aim was to determine whether non-initiation of statins was associated with more conservative treatment, defined as non-receipt of evidence-based medicines and/or coronary artery procedures. METHODS: We used person-linked hospital administrative and Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme data to identify incident ACS admissions between 2005 and 2008 in Western Australia and prescription medicine use, respectively. Outcomes were receipt of any statin, high-dose statin, beta-blockers, renin-angiotensin system inhibitors (RASI), antiplatelets and coronary artery procedures within six months of the incident ACS and were analysed using multivariable generalised linear regression models. RESULTS: In 1,558 patients (52.4% female, mean age 82.6 years), initiation of any statin or high-dose statin decreased with increasing frailty. The adjusted risk ratios for any statin were 0.89 (95% CI: 0.82-0.97) and 0.67 (95% CI: 0.54-0.85) for the intermediate- and high-frailty categories compared with the low-frailty category, respectively. Compared with patients who received statins, those not receiving statins were less likely (p<0.001) to receive beta-blockers (80.8% vs 51.5%), RASI (86.9% vs 62.1%), antiplatelets (90.9% vs 65.1%) or a coronary artery procedure (65.9% vs 21.1%). CONCLUSIONS: Increasing frailty is inversely associated with initiation of statins and generally leads to a more conservative approach to treatment of older patients with ACS.

Nurse-led, telephone-based follow-up after acute coronary syndrome yields improved risk factors after 36 months: the randomized controlled NAILED-ACS trial.

We investigated whether a nurse-led, telephone-based follow-up including medical titration was superior to usual care in improving blood pressure (BP) and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) values 36 months after acute coronary syndrome (ACS). We screened all patients admitted with ACS at Östersund hospital, Sweden, between January 1, 2010, and December 31, 2014, for inclusion based on ability to participate in a telephone-based follow-up. Participants were randomly allocated to usual care or an intervention group that received counselling and medical titration to target BP < 140/< 90 mmHg and LDL-C < 2.5/< 1.8 mmol/L. The primary outcome was LDL-C at 36 months. Of 962 patients, 797 (83%) were available for analysis after 36 months. Compared to controls, the intervention group had a mean systolic BP (SBP) 4.1 mmHg lower (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.9-6.5), mean diastolic BP (DBP) 2.9 mmHg lower (95% CI 1.5-4.5), and mean LDL-C 0.28 mmol/L lower (95% CI 0.135-0.42). All P < 0.001. A significantly greater proportion of patients reached treatment targets with the intervention. After 36 months of follow-up, compared to usual care, the nurse-led, telephone-based intervention led to significantly lower SBP, DBP, and LDL-C and to a larger proportion of patients meeting target values.Trial registration: ISRCTN registry. Trial number ISRCTN96595458. Retrospectively registered.

Interhospital and interindividual variability in secondary prevention: a comparison of outpatients with a history of chronic coronary syndrome versus outpatients with a history of acute coronary syndrome (the iASPIRE Study).

BACKGROUND: Studying variability in the care provided to secondary prevention coronary heart disease (CHD) outpatients can identify interventions to improve their outcomes. METHODS: We studied outpatients who had an index CHD event in the preceding 6-24 months. Eligible CHD events included acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and coronary revascularisation for stable chronic coronary syndrome (CCS). Site training was provided by a core team and data were collected using standardised methods. RESULTS: Between 2017 and 2019, we enrolled 721 outpatients at nine Irish study sites; 81% were men and mean age was 63.9 (SD ±8.9) years. The study examination occurred a median of 1.16 years after the index CHD event, which was ACS in 399 participants (55%) and stable-CCS in 322. On examination, 42.5% had blood pressure (BP) >140/90 mm Hg, 63.7% had low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) >1.8 mmol/L and 44.1% of known diabetics had an HbA1c >7%. There was marked variability in risk factor control, both by study site and, in particular, by index presentation type. For example, 82% of outpatients with prior-ACS had attended cardiac rehabilitation versus 59% outpatients with prior-CCS (p<0.001) and there were also large differences in control of traditional risk factors like LDL-C (p=0.002) and systolic BP (p<0.001) among outpatients with prior-ACS versus prior-CCS as the index presentation. CONCLUSIONS: Despite international secondary prevention guidelines broadly recommending the same risk factor targets for all adults with CHD, we found marked differences in outpatient risk factor control and management on the basis of hospital location and index CHD presentation type (acute vs chronic). These findings highlight the need to reduce hospital-level and patient-level variability in preventive care to improve outcomes; a lesson that should inform CHD prevention programmes in Ireland and around the world.

Impact of adherence to drugs for secondary prevention on mortality and cardiovascular morbidity: A population-based cohort study. IMPACT study.

PURPOSE: Adherence to pharmacological therapy for secondary prevention after an acute coronary syndrome (ACS) reduces the risk of new cardiovascular events. However, several studies showed poor adherence. Our study aim was to assess the risk of a composite endpoint of major cardiovascular events (MACE) and all-cause mortality according to the adherence to these drugs in patients after an ACS in a primary health care cohort. METHODS: Population-based observational cohort study of patients with a first episode of ACS during 2009-2016. DATA SOURCE: Information System for Research in Primary Care (SIDIAP) database. Drug adherence was evaluated through proportion of days covered (PDC). RESULTS: We included 7152 patients and 5692 (79.6%) were adherent (PDC ≥ 75%) to the study drugs during the first year after the event. Adherents to any combination showed a significant reduction of the composite endpoint risk (HR 0.80 [0.73-0.88]), and a significant lower probability of the composite endpoint than nonadherents for all drugs, except beta-blockers. Adherents to 2 (HR 1.2; 95% CI 1.0-1.3) and 1 drug (HR 1.5; 95% CI 1.2-1.8) had higher composite endpoint risk compared to adherents to 4-3 drugs. CONCLUSION: Adherence to any combination of recommended drugs reduced the composite endpoint risk, regardless the number of drugs prescribed. Adherence to a combination of 4-3 drugs was significantly associated with a reduced mortality risk compared with adherents to 2 or 1, but it was not significant for MACE.

Effect of once-weekly exenatide on hospitalization for acute coronary syndrome or coronary revascularization in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Cardiovascular (CV) outcome studies of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) have shifted the paradigm of type 2 diabetes management given their benefits regarding a reduction in major adverse CV events. However, the relationship between GLP-1 RAs and coronary revascularization remains poorly understood. In this EXSCEL post-hoc analysis, we used univariate Cox proportional models and Kaplan Meier survival analysis to evaluate the effect of once-weekly exenatide (EQW) on a composite outcome of hospitalization for acute coronary syndrome (ACS) or coronary revascularization. Similar models were utilized to evaluate the relationship between significant participant characteristics within the entire study population and the composite outcome. Of the 14,736 participants in EXSCEL with complete follow-up data, 1642 (11.1%) experienced an ACS or coronary revascularization event during a median follow-up of 3.3 years (interquartile range, 2.3-4.4). EQW had no effect on hospitalization for ACS or coronary revascularization (HR 1.00, 95% CI 0.91-1.10). Among EXSCEL participants, enrollment in Latin America (HR 0.51, 95% CI 0.43-0.60) and a history of peripheral artery disease (HR 0.79, 95% CI 0.70-0.90) were associated with a reduced risk for coronary revascularization, whereas enrollment in North America (HR 1.92, 95% CI 1.74-2.12), a history of CV disease (HR 3.24, 95% CI 2.78-3.78), and a previous myocardial infarction (HR 1.54, 95% CI 1.39-1.71) were associated with increased risk for study end points. EQW had no association with hospitalization for ACS or coronary revascularization. Participant enrollment location and CV disease burden may play a role in the variable CV efficacy of GLP-1 RAs that has been observed in trials thus far.